Neil McArdle

A history of architecture in thirty drawings

Each building is drawn for one idea it added to how we build: a new way to span a room, carry a load, let in light or lay out a plan. Scroll down through 11,500 years, from carved pillars in Anatolia to the frame that freed the modern wall.

30 buildings, each with its sources listed beside it.

01Neolithic, 9,500 BCE to 3,000 BCEc. 9500 BCEŞanlıurfa, Turkey

Göbekli Tepe

Monuments came before farming.

03 m14 m5.5 mCentral pillar1Carved arms and hands2Stone wall3Pedestal of bedrock4Bedrock5Earth fill6
Fig. 1a Section across Enclosure D, looking past the two central pillars to the far wall. The pillars stand on low pedestals carved from the bedrock. Simplified from published plans; the head and shaft widths are estimates.
  1. Central pillar
  2. Carved arms and hands
  3. Stone wall
  4. Pedestal of bedrock
  5. Bedrock
  6. Earth fill

Rings of carved limestone pillars, the tallest 5.5 metres and eight to ten tonnes, stand on low pedestals carved from the bedrock. They were raised by people who still lived by hunting and gathering, in the centuries when farming was only beginning in the region. Later digs found houses and water cisterns, so it was never the lonely temple first described. It is still among the oldest monumental buildings known.

Sources: Haklay and Gopher, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 2020; DAI, The Tepe Telegrams. Estimated from drawings and photographs: spacing of the central pillars, pillar head width, pillar shaft width.

Head1Arms2Hands meet3Belt4Fox pelt5Pedestal6
Fig. 1b Pillar 18 drawn larger. The T is a figure: the crossbar is the head, and arms, hands, a belt and a fox pelt are carved into the shaft.
  1. Head
  2. Arms
  3. Hands meet
  4. Belt
  5. Fox pelt
  6. Pedestal

02Neolithic, 9,500 BCE to 3,000 BCEc. 7100 BCEKonya, Turkey

Çatalhöyük

A town with no streets, entered through the roof.

05 m6 m3 mRoofs were the streets1Hatch and ladder2Each house has its own walls3Platform4Oven below the hatch5Older houses buried below6
Fig. 2a Section through six houses built wall against wall. There are no streets or doors at ground level: people walked across the roofs and climbed down ladders. The red line follows the way in.
  1. Roofs were the streets
  2. Hatch and ladder
  3. Each house has its own walls
  4. Platform
  5. Oven below the hatch
  6. Older houses buried below

In a typical year perhaps 600 to 800 people lived here, in mudbrick houses packed so tightly that there were no streets. You crossed the town on its roofs and climbed down a ladder through a hatch, which also let out the smoke from the oven below. When a house wore out it was filled in and a new one built on top, so over more than a thousand years the town rose into a mound 21 metres high. The dead were buried under the floors.

Sources: Çatalhöyük 1998 Archive Report; Wikipedia, Çatalhöyük. Estimated from drawings and photographs: wall thickness, room height.

Hatch: door and chimney1Plastered bull horns2Ladder3Oven4Platform5Burials below the floor6
Fig. 2b The roof hatch was both door and chimney. Smoke from the oven rose out past the ladder people climbed in by. The dead were buried under the platforms.
  1. Hatch: door and chimney
  2. Plastered bull horns
  3. Ladder
  4. Oven
  5. Platform
  6. Burials below the floor

03Old Kingdom Egypt, 2,700 BCE to 2,200 BCEc. 2560 BCEGiza, Egypt

Great Pyramid

Mass is the structure.

040 m230.35 m146.6 mApex, now missing1Relieving chambers2King's Chamber3Grand Gallery4Queen's Chamber5Entrance6Descending passage7Rock-cut chamber8
Fig. 3a Section looking west. Almost all of it is solid stone; the passages and chambers are drawn slightly wider than true so they read at this scale. The top 8 metres, above the dashed line, are now missing.
  1. Apex, now missing
  2. Relieving chambers
  3. King's Chamber
  4. Grand Gallery
  5. Queen's Chamber
  6. Entrance
  7. Descending passage
  8. Rock-cut chamber

Built for the pharaoh Khufu from about 2.3 million blocks, it rose 146.6 metres and stayed the tallest structure on Earth for almost 3,900 years. It is nearly solid: the structure is simply its own weight, stacked at a slope of about 52 degrees. The hard part was the few rooms inside. Over the King's Chamber, five low compartments and a roof of leaning blocks steer the weight of the stone above around the room and into its walls.

Sources: Petrie, The Pyramids and Temples of Gizeh, 1883; Wikipedia, Great Pyramid of Giza. Estimated from drawings and photographs: relieving chamber gable rise.

Weight from above1Gabled roof2Relief chambers3Granite beams4Cracked beam5King's Chamber6Load goes round the room7
Fig. 3b Five low compartments and a gabled roof sit over the King's Chamber. The leaning blocks of the gable push the weight above out to the walls, so it goes round the room rather than onto its granite ceiling.
  1. Weight from above
  2. Gabled roof
  3. Relief chambers
  4. Granite beams
  5. Cracked beam
  6. King's Chamber
  7. Load goes round the room

04Indus Valley, 2,600 BCE to 1,900 BCEc. 2500 BCESindh, Pakistan

Mohenjo-daro

The planned grid and the covered drain.

030 m9.1 mN1Main street2Covered drain3House drain4Inspection hole5Well6Narrow lane7Courtyard house8
Fig. 4a A representative plan, not a survey. The street widths, lanes and house sizes follow the lower town, but the houses are schematic. Covered drains, in red, run along the streets, with inspection holes and short drains coming in from the houses.
  1. N
  2. Main street
  3. Covered drain
  4. House drain
  5. Inspection hole
  6. Well
  7. Narrow lane
  8. Courtyard house

One of the largest cities of the Indus civilisation, laid out with main streets running north to south and east to west, and narrow lanes between blocks of houses. It was built of fired bricks made to the same proportions. Almost every house had a bathing floor, and many had their own well. Waste water ran down chutes into covered brick drains along the streets, with holes where they could be cleared. Few cities had anything like it for thousands of years.

Sources: Mackay, Further Excavations at Mohenjo-daro, 1938, via Harappa.com; Harappa.com, Ancient Indus city drains; Wikipedia, Mohenjo-daro. Estimated from drawings and photographs: lane widths, house plans.

Bathing floor1Chute in wall2Covered street drain3Sump catches silt4Lift bricks to clean it5
Fig. 4b Water from an upstairs bathing floor runs down a chute in the wall into a brick sump at the street edge. Silt settles there; the water flows on into the covered drain under the street.
  1. Bathing floor
  2. Chute in wall
  3. Covered street drain
  4. Sump catches silt
  5. Lift bricks to clean it

05Greek, 800 BCE to 146 BCE447–432 BCEAthens, Greece

Parthenon

Post and lintel, bent so it looks straight.

010 m30.89 m10.43 mPediment1Frieze2Architrave3Capital4Column5Three steps6
Fig. 5a West front restored to its finished state, without the pediment sculpture. Eight Doric columns; the corner gaps are narrower so the triglyphs can meet at the corners.
  1. Pediment
  2. Frieze
  3. Architrave
  4. Capital
  5. Column
  6. Three steps

Columns carry stone beams, and the beams carry a roof. The system is ancient; the Parthenon perfects it. The floor rises about 11 centimetres towards the middle of each long side, the columns lean slightly inward and swell as they rise, and the corner columns are thicker. A building made only of straight lines can look like it sags. This one was bent on purpose so that it reads as straight.

Sources: Penrose, Principles of Athenian Architecture, 1888. Estimated from drawings and photographs: upper column diameter, corner column spacing.

Floor rises towards the middle1Columns lean in2Shafts swell slightly3Corner columns thicker4
Fig. 5b Dashed lines are truly level and plumb; the red lines are what was built. The real floor curve is about 11 cm over 70 m, far too small to see as a curve.
  1. Floor rises towards the middle
  2. Columns lean in
  3. Shafts swell slightly
  4. Corner columns thicker

06Mauryan, 322 BCE to 185 BCE3rd century BCESanchi, India

Great Stupa

A building you walk around, not into.

010 m36.6 m16.46 mSolid dome1Harmika and umbrellas2Gateway (torana)3Upper path4Stone railing5
Fig. 6a Elevation from the south, through the south gateway, with the double stair rising behind it. The dome is solid. The red line is the upper path on the drum, walked clockwise like the ground path inside the railing.
  1. Solid dome
  2. Harmika and umbrellas
  3. Gateway (torana)
  4. Upper path
  5. Stone railing

The emperor Ashoka built the first stupa here in the 3rd century BCE over relics of the Buddha. About a century later it was cased in stone and roughly doubled in size, and four carved gateways followed. The dome is solid, with no room inside. The building is the route around it: pilgrims walk clockwise on a paved path inside the railing, then climb to a second path on the drum. The stone gateways copy timber joints, a trace of the wooden railings that came first.

Sources: Marshall, A Guide to Sanchi, 1918; Govinda, Some Aspects of Stupa Symbolism, 1936. Estimated from drawings and photographs: ground railing diameter, railing height, gateway height.

Walk clockwise1Solid dome2Ground path3Upper path4Gateway5Stair6
Fig. 6b Plan of the stupa. Pilgrims enter through a gateway, walk clockwise on the ground path inside the railing, then climb the south stair and circle again on the drum. There is no way in.
  1. Walk clockwise
  2. Solid dome
  3. Ground path
  4. Upper path
  5. Gateway
  6. Stair

07Roman, 146 BCE to 476 CEc. 114–126 CERome, Italy

Pantheon

A concrete dome that gets lighter as it rises.

010 m43.3 m43.3 m9.1 mOculus, open to the sky1Shell thins to 1.2 m2Step rings3Wall 6.4 m thick4A sphere fits inside5Niche6
Fig. 7a Cross-section through the rotunda, with the portico left off. The dashed red circle is the sphere the room is built around: 43.3 m wide and 43.3 m from floor to oculus.
  1. Oculus, open to the sky
  2. Shell thins to 1.2 m
  3. Step rings
  4. Wall 6.4 m thick
  5. A sphere fits inside
  6. Niche

The dome is 43.3 metres across, and the floor to the top of the dome is the same, so a perfect sphere would fit inside. Roman builders made it from unreinforced concrete, laid in horizontal layers. The mix changes with height: heavy travertine in the walls, tufa and brick in the lower dome, light volcanic pumice near the top. The shell thins from over 6 metres to 1.2 metres around the open oculus. Nineteen centuries later it is still the largest unreinforced concrete dome in the world.

Sources: Wikipedia, Pantheon, citing Wilson Jones 2003. Estimated from drawings and photographs: heights of the concrete zones, outer drum height.

Travertine and tufa1Tufa and brick2Pumice and tufa31.2 m at the top4Wall 6.4 m5
Fig. 7b Half the wall and dome, drawn larger. The stone mixed into the concrete gets lighter with height. The heights where one mix gives way to the next are estimates.
  1. Travertine and tufa
  2. Tufa and brick
  3. Pumice and tufa
  4. 1.2 m at the top
  5. Wall 6.4 m

08Early medieval, 476 CE to 1000532–537Istanbul, Turkey

Hagia Sophia

Pendentives put a round dome on a square.

010 m31.24 m55.6 mDome, rebuilt in 5621Ring of 40 windows2Pendentive3Half-dome4Gallery5Narthex6Apse7
Fig. 8a Section along the church, looking north, with the dome as rebuilt after it fell in 558. Cut parts are hatched. The red curved triangles are the pendentives that carry the round dome on four arches.
  1. Dome, rebuilt in 562
  2. Ring of 40 windows
  3. Pendentive
  4. Half-dome
  5. Gallery
  6. Narthex
  7. Apse

Justinian's church went up in under six years, designed by Anthemius of Tralles and Isidore of Miletus, both mathematicians. A round dome needs a round base, but four piers make a square. The answer was the pendentive: curved triangles of masonry that turn the square into a circle. Pendentives had been used before, never at this size. A ring of 40 windows at the base makes the dome seem to float. The first dome fell in 558 and was rebuilt steeper; it has stood since.

Sources: Wikipedia, Hagia Sophia. Estimated from drawings and photographs: dome base height, main arch springing.

Dome1Ring2Arch3Pendentive4Pier5
Fig. 8b Four arches stand on a square. The pendentives, shaded, are curved triangles cut from one sphere; they fill the corners between the arches and finish in a circle. The dome sits on that circle, in red.
  1. Dome
  2. Ring
  3. Arch
  4. Pendentive
  5. Pier

09Asuka, 538 CE to 710 CElate 7th centuryNara, Japan

Hōryū-ji

A timber pagoda that sways and does not fall.

010 m32.5 m6.42 mTip of the spire1Spire with nine rings2Top storey half as wide3Central pillar, hidden4Deep eaves5Brackets6
Fig. 9a Elevation of the pagoda. Each storey is smaller than the one below; the top is about half the width of the first. The red dashed line is the central pillar, hidden inside, running from a stone below ground up into the spire.
  1. Tip of the spire
  2. Spire with nine rings
  3. Top storey half as wide
  4. Central pillar, hidden
  5. Deep eaves
  6. Brackets

The temple was founded by Prince Shōtoku in the early 7th century and rebuilt after a fire in 670; its pagoda and main hall are among the oldest timber buildings in the world. The five storeys are stacked rather than fixed together, each smaller than the one below. A tall central pillar runs up the middle without carrying any floor. In an earthquake the storeys sway in turn and the pillar calms them, and Japanese pagodas have very rarely fallen.

Sources: Japan Heritage, Hōryū-ji five-storied pagoda; JAANUS, gojuunotou. Estimated from drawings and photographs: spire height, storey heights and eaves.

Free pillar1Rest position2Storeys sway3Loose joints4Stone base5
Fig. 9b Diagram, movement exaggerated. The storeys rest on each other without rigid joints. In an earthquake they swing in alternate directions, and the free central pillar knocks against them and calms the swing. This is the usual explanation; engineers still argue over how much each part does.
  1. Free pillar
  2. Rest position
  3. Storeys sway
  4. Loose joints
  5. Stone base

10Umayyad, 756 CE to 1031785 onwardsCórdoba, Spain

Great Mosque

Arches stacked on arches to lift a low hall.

03 m3 m8.8 m3.15 mUpper arch1Brick and stone2Horseshoe brace3Pier on column4Reused Roman column5
Fig. 10a A row of the prayer hall's arcades, from the first building phase. The reused columns were too short for a tall hall, so a pier stands on each one and carries a second tier of arches. The overall height is an estimate.
  1. Upper arch
  2. Brick and stone
  3. Horseshoe brace
  4. Pier on column
  5. Reused Roman column

Abd al-Rahman I began the prayer hall in 785, reusing columns from Roman and Visigothic buildings. They were too short for a tall hall, so the builders stood a pier on each column and set two tiers of arches: horseshoe arches below to brace the supports, round arches above to carry the roof. The arches alternate red brick and white stone. Three later extensions turned the hall into a forest of more than 850 columns.

Sources: Cantizani Oliva and Gámiz Gordo, laser survey, via Universidad de Córdoba; Mosque of Córdoba project, CUNY. Estimated from drawings and photographs: arcade height.

Weight down1Pier2Braces3Impost block4Column5
Fig. 10b The roof's weight comes down the pier and onto the column. The horseshoe arches below tie each pier to the next, so the tall, thin supports cannot buckle sideways.
  1. Weight down
  2. Pier
  3. Braces
  4. Impost block
  5. Column

11Shailendra, 750 CE to 850 CEc. 800Java, Indonesia

Borobudur

A mountain built as a path.

020 m123 m35 mCentral stupa172 latticed stupas2Three round terraces3Four galleries of reliefs4Hidden foot5Stair on each side6
Fig. 11a Elevation of one side. The red dashed lines are the gallery paths behind each balustrade, walked clockwise past the carved reliefs before the stair takes you up a level. The base was later wrapped in a broad foot that hides its first row of reliefs.
  1. Central stupa
  2. 72 latticed stupas
  3. Three round terraces
  4. Four galleries of reliefs
  5. Hidden foot
  6. Stair on each side

Built in central Java around 800, Borobudur has no interior. It is a stepped mountain of stone wrapped around a hill, made to be climbed. Pilgrims walk clockwise round four galleries carved with relief panels, rising level by level, until the walls fall away on three open round terraces. There, 72 latticed stupas each hold a seated Buddha around a great central stupa.

Sources: Wikipedia, Borobudur, citing Soekmono 1976; Borobudur Park, Google Arts and Culture. Estimated from drawings and photographs: terrace heights and round terrace sizes.

Start at the east stair1Square galleries2Walk clockwise3Round terraces4
Fig. 11b Plan, with the route in red. Pilgrims enter from the east, circle each square gallery clockwise, climb, and circle again, about 5 km in all, before the round terraces lead to the central stupa.
  1. Start at the east stair
  2. Square galleries
  3. Walk clockwise
  4. Round terraces

12Romanesque, 1000 to 11501093–1133Durham, England

Durham Cathedral

The rib vault: a frame of arches under a thin shell.

010 m9.86 m22.2 mRib vault1Pointed transverse arch2Diagonal rib3Hidden quarter arch4Thick wall5Carved round pier6Gallery7Aisle8
Fig. 12a Cross-section through a nave bay, looking east. Cut parts are hatched; the round piers, ribs and arches are seen beyond. The ribs of the high vault are in red. Under the gallery roofs, quarter arches brace the nave wall: flying buttresses before they learned to fly. They were enlarged in the 19th century.
  1. Rib vault
  2. Pointed transverse arch
  3. Diagonal rib
  4. Hidden quarter arch
  5. Thick wall
  6. Carved round pier
  7. Gallery
  8. Aisle

Begun in 1093, Durham was planned from the start to be vaulted in stone, and its vaults are among the earliest rib vaults in Europe. Arched ribs went up first across each bay, and thin panels of stone were filled in between. The nave's transverse arches, finished by about 1133, are pointed, decades before Gothic made that normal. Under the gallery roofs, hidden quarter arches brace the walls: an early form of the flying buttress.

Sources: Victoria County History, Durham, vol. 3, 1928; Greenwell, via University of Pittsburgh. Estimated from drawings and photographs: wall thickness and gallery heights.

Diagonal ribs1Pointed arch2Thin web3Pier4
Fig. 12b One bay of the vault. The diagonal ribs, in red, are semicircles over the long diagonals, so they rise higher than a round arch over the shorter sides could. Pointing the side arches lets them reach the same height. The ribs went up first; the thin web was filled in between them.
  1. Diagonal ribs
  2. Pointed arch
  3. Thin web
  4. Pier

13Khmer, 802 CE to 1431c. 1113–1150Siem Reap, Cambodia

Angkor Wat

Corbelled galleries around a model of the cosmos.

020 m187 m65 mCentral tower1Corner towers2Upper terrace3Steep stairs4Second gallery5Outer gallery of reliefs6
Fig. 13a Elevation from the west, across the moat causeway. Three rings of galleries step up to the central terrace and its five towers. The plan sizes are surveyed; the heights of the terraces and corner towers are estimates.
  1. Central tower
  2. Corner towers
  3. Upper terrace
  4. Steep stairs
  5. Second gallery
  6. Outer gallery of reliefs

Built for Suryavarman II in the first half of the 12th century, Angkor Wat is a model of the Hindu cosmos in stone. Five towers stand for the peaks of Mount Meru, three rings of galleries for the mountain ranges around it, and the moat for the ocean. Khmer builders never used the true arch. Every gallery is roofed by corbelling, stones stepped in course by course until they meet, which keeps the galleries narrow: the outer one is under 2.5 metres wide inside.

Sources: Wikipedia, Angkor Wat; Glaize, The Monuments of the Angkor Group, 1944. Estimated from drawings and photographs: terrace and tower heights.

2.45 mNo keystone1Courses step in2Half-vault3Square pillar4Relief wall5
Fig. 13b Section through the outer gallery. There is no true arch and no keystone: each course of stone steps in a little past the one below, held in place by the weight on its tail, until the two sides meet. Corbelling only spans a few metres, so the galleries are long and narrow.
  1. No keystone
  2. Courses step in
  3. Half-vault
  4. Square pillar
  5. Relief wall

14Gothic, 1150 to 14001194–1220Chartres, France

Chartres Cathedral

The flying buttress replaces the wall.

010 m16.4 m37 mStone vault1Flying buttress2Buttress pier3Clerestory window4Thrust reaches the ground5Timber roof6Aisle7
Fig. 14a Cross-section through the middle of a nave bay, looking east. Cut parts are hatched; the piers, ribs and flying buttresses are seen beyond. The red line follows the push of the vault down to the ground.
  1. Stone vault
  2. Flying buttress
  3. Buttress pier
  4. Clerestory window
  5. Thrust reaches the ground
  6. Timber roof
  7. Aisle

A stone vault pushes outward as well as down. Romanesque churches resisted the push with thick walls and small windows. At Chartres, rebuilt after a fire in 1194, the push is caught by arches that fly over the aisle roofs to heavy piers outside. With the walls no longer holding anything up, they could become glass. The vault is 37 metres up, and the church still has most of its 13th-century windows.

Sources: Wikipédia, Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres; Chartres tourist office, dimensions. Estimated from drawings and photographs: storey and buttress heights.

Vault pushes out1Flyer carries it across2Pinnacle adds weight3Push turns down4Lands inside the base5
Fig. 14b The push of the vault, traced in red. The flyer carries it over the aisle, the weight of the pinnacle bends it downward, and it reaches the ground inside the pier.
  1. Vault pushes out
  2. Flyer carries it across
  3. Pinnacle adds weight
  4. Push turns down
  5. Lands inside the base

15Great Zimbabwe, 1100 to 1450c. 1300Masvingo, Zimbabwe

Great Zimbabwe

Granite walls laid without mortar.

05 m11 m5 m9 mGranite blocks, no mortar1Narrow passage2Solid conical tower3
Fig. 15a Section through the outer wall where it runs beside the conical tower. Both faces lean inward, more steeply above about 4 m, which narrows the wall from 5 m at the base to under 2 m at the top; the red dashed lines are plumb. The inner wall and passage are estimates.
  1. Granite blocks, no mortar
  2. Narrow passage
  3. Solid conical tower

The capital of a trading state on the Zimbabwe plateau, built between the 13th and 15th centuries by ancestors of the Shona. The outer wall of the Great Enclosure runs about 250 metres round and rises to about 11 metres, made of dressed granite blocks with no mortar at all. Both faces lean inward, so the wall narrows as it rises and its weight holds it together. Inside stands a solid conical tower, and a band of chevrons runs along the top of the wall.

Sources: Wikipedia, Great Zimbabwe, citing Pwiti 1991; Zimbabwe Field Guide, Great Enclosure, citing Garlake 1973. Estimated from drawings and photographs: inner wall, passage width and block sizes.

Double chevron band1Block bridges a joint2Dry courses3
Fig. 15b The outer face near the top, with its band of chevrons. Every block rests across a joint in the course below, and the wall stands by weight and fit alone.
  1. Double chevron band
  2. Block bridges a joint
  3. Dry courses

16Ming, 1368 to 16441406–1420Beijing, China

Forbidden City

Dougong brackets let a heavy roof flex.

010 m63.96 m8.13 m26.92 mRidge ornament1Double hipped roof2Dougong brackets3Timber column4Three-tier marble terrace5
Fig. 16a The hall as rebuilt in 1695, on its three-tier marble terrace. Bracket sets, in red, sit between the columns and both tiers of eaves. The roof and bracket profiles are drawn from photographs and are approximate.
  1. Ridge ornament
  2. Double hipped roof
  3. Dougong brackets
  4. Timber column
  5. Three-tier marble terrace

The palace was built for the Yongle Emperor between 1406 and 1420; the Hall of Supreme Harmony standing today is a rebuilding of 1695. It is a timber frame of 72 columns on a three-tier marble terrace, under a double hipped roof. Between columns and roof sit dougong: interlocking brackets of small blocks and arms, fitted without nails, that gather the weight of the deep eaves onto the columns and let the joints give a little in an earthquake.

Sources: Wikipedia (Chinese), 太和殿, citing the Palace Museum. Estimated from drawings and photographs: bracket and roof profiles.

Eave purlin1Arms widen2Small blocks3Cap block4Column5
Fig. 16b A bracket set drawn larger. Wooden arms and small blocks stack in tiers, each wider than the one below, so the weight of the eaves gathers onto the column. The joints are fitted, not nailed, and can rock a little without coming apart.
  1. Eave purlin
  2. Arms widen
  3. Small blocks
  4. Cap block
  5. Column

17Renaissance, 1400 to 16001420–1436Florence, Italy

Florence Cathedral dome

A dome built without scaffolding from the ground.

020 m45.5 m55 m116 mLantern1Thin outer shell2Thick inner shell3Stone and timber chains4Drum5
Fig. 17a Section across the corners of the octagon. Two shells of brick rise from the drum on the pointed-fifth curve, the thick inner one carrying the thin outer one, with a gap between them for stairs. The red marks are the stone and timber chains that hoop the dome. The drum, piers and lantern are simplified.
  1. Lantern
  2. Thin outer shell
  3. Thick inner shell
  4. Stone and timber chains
  5. Drum

For decades the cathedral had a hole in it: an octagon 45 metres across and 55 metres up, too wide to bridge with wooden centring. Filippo Brunelleschi built the dome from 1420 to 1436 as two shells of brick, a thick inner one carrying a thin outer one, tied by ribs and by chains of stone and timber. The bricks were laid in a herringbone pattern, so each course was locked in place as it went up and the dome held itself while it rose.

Sources: Wikipedia (Italian), Cupola del Brunelleschi; Salvadori, Why Buildings Stand Up, 1980; Wikipedia, Florence Cathedral. Estimated from drawings and photographs: drum thickness and lantern profile.

Flat courses1Upright bricks lock it2Spirals up the dome3
Fig. 17b A patch of the inner shell. Upright bricks, in red, are set into the flat courses at intervals and shift along a little in each course, so they climb the dome in spirals. Each upright held the next course in place while its mortar set, which is how the dome rose without wooden centring.
  1. Flat courses
  2. Upright bricks lock it
  3. Spirals up the dome

18Inca, 1438 to 1533c. 1450Cusco, Peru

Machu Picchu

Fitted stone that shakes loose and settles back.

03 m10 mDry-laid stone1Trapezoidal windows2Single lintel3Leans in4Terrace wall5
Fig. 18a Elevation of a fine stone wall with three trapezoidal windows, standing on a terrace of rougher stone; on the right, a section through the wall. The wall leans inward by about 4 degrees; the red dashed line is plumb. Wall, window and block sizes are estimates drawn from photographs.
  1. Dry-laid stone
  2. Trapezoidal windows
  3. Single lintel
  4. Leans in
  5. Terrace wall

Built for the Inca ruler Pachacuti around 1450 on a ridge high in the Andes, in a region of frequent earthquakes. Its finest walls are dry-laid: every stone shaped to fit its neighbours so closely that no mortar was needed. Walls lean inward by a few degrees, and doors, windows and niches narrow towards the top. When the ground shakes, the stones can move against each other and settle back into place.

Sources: Kubicka, laser metrology of Machu Picchu, IMEKO 2016; Wikipedia, Machu Picchu. Estimated from drawings and photographs: wall length, window, door and block sizes.

Cut to fit its neighbours1No mortar in the joints2
Fig. 18b Close-fitted masonry. Each stone is cut to the shape of its neighbours, with joints too tight for mortar. In an earthquake the stones can shift against each other and settle back into place.
  1. Cut to fit its neighbours
  2. No mortar in the joints

19Ottoman, 1453 to 17001550–1557Istanbul, Turkey

Süleymaniye Mosque

A dome held up by a cascade of half-domes.

020 m26.5 m53 m58.5 m76 mMinaret1Weight tower2Half-dome3Pendentive4Thick end wall5
Fig. 19a Section along the main axis, with the half-domes in red and one of the tall minarets beyond. The dome rises to twice its width. The pier, window and half-dome sizes are drawn from the dome's dimensions and photographs.
  1. Minaret
  2. Weight tower
  3. Half-dome
  4. Pendentive
  5. Thick end wall

Mimar Sinan built the mosque for Suleiman the Magnificent between 1550 and 1557. He took the plan of Hagia Sophia, a central dome with half-domes on the main axis, and made it his own. The dome is about 26.5 metres across and rises 53 metres, twice its width. Its push passes down through the half-domes into thick walls and buttresses, so from outside the building reads as a stepped hill of domes.

Sources: Wikipedia, Süleymaniye Mosque, citing Goodwin 1971. Estimated from drawings and photographs: half-dome, pier and window sizes.

Dome pushes out1Half-dome takes it2Walls carry it down3
Fig. 19b Diagram of half the building. The push of the dome passes into a half-dome, and from the half-dome into the thick end walls and buttresses, stepping down like water over a weir.
  1. Dome pushes out
  2. Half-dome takes it
  3. Walls carry it down

20Edo, 1603 to 1868c. 1615–1660Kyoto, Japan

Katsura Imperial Villa

A house planned in floor mats.

06 m9.55 m4.77 m15 mats1Old Shoin2Middle Shoin3Music room, 3 mats4New Shoin5Moon-viewing platform6
Fig. 20a Plan of the Old, Middle and New Shoin with their mats laid in. One mat is outlined in red. The room sizes in mats follow the published plans; the outline of the halls, the verandas and the moon-viewing platform are simplified.
  1. 15 mats
  2. Old Shoin
  3. Middle Shoin
  4. Music room, 3 mats
  5. New Shoin
  6. Moon-viewing platform

Built in stages from about 1615 by Prince Toshihito and then his son Toshitada, the villa's halls are planned in tatami. Every room is named by the number of mats it holds, from three to fifteen, and every mat is the same size, about 1.91 by 0.955 metres in Kyoto. The halls step back across the garden one behind another, raised on posts, with a bamboo platform for watching the moon over the pond.

Sources: Wikipedia, Tatami, citing Sato 1994; Wikipedia (Japanese), 桂離宮. Estimated from drawings and photographs: building layout, posts and platform size.

1.91 m3 mats14½ mats26 mats38 mats410 mats5
Fig. 20b Common room sizes. A Kyoto mat is 1.91 by 0.955 metres, twice as long as it is wide, so rooms are named by their mat count. The mats are laid so that no four corners meet.
  1. 3 mats
  2. 4½ mats
  3. 6 mats
  4. 8 mats
  5. 10 mats

21Mughal, 1526 to 18571632–1653Agra, India

Taj Mahal

Two domes: one for the room, one for the skyline.

020 m57.3 m6 m73 mFinial1Outer dome2Hollow between3Inner dome4Main arch frame5Minaret6
Fig. 21a Section through the mausoleum on its plinth, with two minarets beyond. The two domes are in red. The overall height, width, plinth and arch frame are from published figures; the dome profiles, drum and the void between them are drawn from photographs because the sources disagree.
  1. Finial
  2. Outer dome
  3. Hollow between
  4. Inner dome
  5. Main arch frame
  6. Minaret

Shah Jahan began the tomb for his wife Mumtaz Mahal in 1632; the mausoleum was finished in 1648 and the whole complex in 1653, under the architect Ustad Ahmad Lahori. It has two domes. The inner one is sized to the tomb chamber below it. Above it, an empty space and a tall drum lift the outer dome high enough to rule the skyline, 73 metres to the tip of its finial.

Sources: Wikipedia, Taj Mahal, citing the Archaeological Survey of India. Estimated from drawings and photographs: dome, drum and void sizes.

Outer dome1Empty space2Drum3Inner dome4
Fig. 21b The two domes drawn larger. The inner dome is sized to the tomb chamber below it. The outer dome stands on a tall drum above an empty space, high enough to read across the river and the garden.
  1. Outer dome
  2. Empty space
  3. Drum
  4. Inner dome

22Industrial, 1750 to 18901851London, England

Crystal Palace

A building made in a factory and bolted together.

020 m7.32 m139 m32.9 mArched transept1Ridge-and-furrow roof2Iron and glass3
Fig. 22a The south end of the building, with the arched transept rising above three tiers. Everything is on a 24 ft grid; one bay is outlined in red. The width, grid and transept height are from published figures; the tier heights are estimates.
  1. Arched transept
  2. Ridge-and-furrow roof
  3. Iron and glass

Joseph Paxton, a gardener who built glasshouses, designed the hall for the Great Exhibition of 1851, and it opened within a year of his first sketch. It was made from a few standard parts, cast-iron columns, iron girders and panes of glass 49 by 10 inches, on a 24-foot grid, made in factories and bolted together in Hyde Park. It was 1,848 feet long, needed about 293,000 panes, and was later taken down and rebuilt at Sydenham.

Sources: Wikipedia, The Crystal Palace; Western Australian Museum, 1851 commemorative medal. Estimated from drawings and photographs: storey heights and tier widths.

2.44 mGlass ridge and furrow1Paxton gutter2Iron girder3Hollow column4
Fig. 22b Section through one bay of roof. The glass is laid in ridges and furrows. Rain runs off the glass into Paxton's timber gutters in the furrows, along to the girder, and down inside the hollow cast-iron columns, which doubled as drainpipes.
  1. Glass ridge and furrow
  2. Paxton gutter
  3. Iron girder
  4. Hollow column

23Industrial, 1750 to 18901884–1885Chicago, USA

Home Insurance Building

A metal frame carries the walls.

010 m42.06 m35.97 mIron columns1Iron beams2Steel beams above3Brick and stone front4
Fig. 23a The 138 ft front as built in 1885, with nine storeys at the floor heights published in 1884. On the left, the brick and stone front; on the right, the same front with its walls removed to show the iron frame, in red, that carried them. The bay spacing is an estimate.
  1. Iron columns
  2. Iron beams
  3. Steel beams above
  4. Brick and stone front

William Le Baron Jenney's office building in Chicago, finished in 1885, is often called the first skyscraper. Its two street fronts were carried on a frame of cast-iron columns and wrought-iron beams, with some of the first steel beams in the upper floors, instead of thick masonry walls carrying everything. The frame was said to weigh a third as much as a masonry building. It was demolished in 1931.

Sources: Inland Architect, September 1884, via Chicagology; Wikipedia, Home Insurance Building. Estimated from drawings and photographs: bay spacing and joint details.

Cast-iron column1Brick pier2Iron beam3Bracket4Hollow tile floor5
Fig. 23b Section through a pier at one floor. A cast-iron column, in red, runs up inside the brick pier. An iron beam rests on a bracket from the column and carries a floor of hollow clay tile. The details are typical of the time rather than measured from this building.
  1. Cast-iron column
  2. Brick pier
  3. Iron beam
  4. Bracket
  5. Hollow tile floor

24Art Nouveau, 1890 to 19141898–1914Santa Coloma de Cervelló, Spain

Colònia Güell church

Hang chains, turn them over, and you have the arches.

02 m4 mBoard fixed to the ceiling1Strings hang into arches2Bags of lead shot3Leaning strings4
Fig. 24a A reconstruction of the idea behind Gaudí's model, about 4 m deep at a scale of 1 to 10. Strings hang from a board on the ceiling and small bags of lead shot stand for the weight each part would carry. The main arch is in red. The string layout is simplified; the original was lost in the Spanish Civil War.
  1. Board fixed to the ceiling
  2. Strings hang into arches
  3. Bags of lead shot
  4. Leaning strings

For the church of a textile workers' colony, Gaudí spent about ten years on a model hung upside down: strings fixed to a board, weighted with bags of lead shot, at a scale of 1 to 10. A hanging string falls into a shape of pure tension; turned over, the same shape carries pure compression. The model found the arches, vaults and leaning columns for him. Only the crypt was built, from 1908, before work stopped in 1914.

Sources: Viquipèdia, Cripta de la Colònia Güell, citing Bassegoda; Casa Batlló, Güell crypt. Estimated from drawings and photographs: string layout of the model.

Hanging: pulled1Turned over: pushed2
Fig. 24b A hanging chain is pulled into a curve where every link is in pure tension. Turned upside down, the same curve stands as an arch in pure compression, with no bending at all. Gaudí's model found the shapes of his arches, vaults and leaning columns this way.
  1. Hanging: pulled
  2. Turned over: pushed

25Sudano-Sahelian, 1300 to now1907Djenné, Mali

Great Mosque of Djenné

A mud building the whole town replasters every year.

010 m75 m3 m16 mCentral tower1Buttress pinnacles2Toron ends3Raised platform4
Fig. 25a The qibla wall with its three towers, on a platform 3 m above the market square. The red dots are the ends of the palm-wood toron that bristle from the walls. The platform and the central tower are from published figures; the wall height, side towers and buttress spacing are estimates.
  1. Central tower
  2. Buttress pinnacles
  3. Toron ends
  4. Raised platform

The largest mud-brick building in the world stands on a platform about 75 metres square and 3 metres high in the middle of the town. The present mosque was built in 1906 and 1907 by the masons' guild under Ismaila Traoré, from sun-dried mud brick plastered with mud. Rain washes the surface away, so every year the town replasters it together in a festival, the crépissage. The palm-wood sticks that bristle from the walls are permanent scaffolding.

Sources: Maas, De Moskee van Djenné, Bulletin KNOB, 1989; Wikipedia, Great Mosque of Djenné. Estimated from drawings and photographs: wall heights, side towers and buttress spacing.

1 m0.6 mPalm-wood toron1Fresh coat2Sun-dried mud brick3Palm-log roof4
Fig. 25b A section through the mud wall. The toron, in red, stick out about 60 cm and serve as permanent scaffolding: every year the townspeople climb them to spread a fresh coat of mud over the whole building before the rains.
  1. Palm-wood toron
  2. Fresh coat
  3. Sun-dried mud brick
  4. Palm-log roof

26Modernism, 1914 to 19751928–1931Poissy, France

Villa Savoye

Columns carry the house, so the walls go anywhere.

05 m21.5 m4.75 m9.4 mThin columns1Ribbon window2Roof garden3Facade hangs free4Glass ground floor5
Fig. 26a Elevation of the main front. The upper floor is a box on five thin columns; the glass ground floor sits back in the shadow, and the curved screens of the roof garden rise above.
  1. Thin columns
  2. Ribbon window
  3. Roof garden
  4. Facade hangs free
  5. Glass ground floor

Le Corbusier and Pierre Jeanneret raised the house on thin concrete columns. The columns and floor slabs carry all the weight, so no wall has to. Walls inside can curve wherever the rooms need them, and the outside skin can open into one long window. Underneath, the curved glass wall of the ground floor follows the turning circle of a car. On top, the roof becomes a garden.

Sources: Wikipédia, Villa Savoye; Wikipedia, Villa Savoye. Estimated from drawings and photographs: cantilever, ground floor height.

Slab overhangs1Columns carry it all2Stair3
Fig. 26b Le Corbusier's Dom-ino frame of 1914, the idea behind the house. Slabs and thin columns, in red, carry everything, so walls and windows can go wherever the plan needs them.
  1. Slab overhangs
  2. Columns carry it all
  3. Stair

27Modernism, 1914 to 19751936–1939Pennsylvania, USA

Fallingwater

Concrete terraces that hang out over a waterfall.

06 m4.57 mCantilevered terrace1Stone chimney core2Pier on the rock3Waterfall4Glass between slabs5
Fig. 27a The house from downstream, with the living-room terrace cantilevered out over the falls; its cantilever is in red. The 15 ft cantilever is from published figures; the rock, falls and floor levels are drawn from photographs.
  1. Cantilevered terrace
  2. Stone chimney core
  3. Pier on the rock
  4. Waterfall
  5. Glass between slabs

Frank Lloyd Wright built the house for the Kaufmann family between 1936 and 1939, over the waterfall rather than facing it. Reinforced concrete terraces cantilever as much as 15 feet from stone piers set on the rock, stacked and turned against each other above the stream. The cantilevers sagged: by 1995 the main terrace had dropped about 7 inches, and in 2002 steel tendons threaded along the beams were tightened to lift and hold it.

Sources: Penn State architectural engineering notes on Fallingwater; Wikipedia, Fallingwater, citing Silman. Estimated from drawings and photographs: floor levels, waterfall height and rock profile.

4.57 m0.58 mStone pier1Sag by 19952Steel tendon, 20023Concrete beam4
Fig. 27b Section along a main beam. By 1995 the tip had sagged about 7 inches (dashed). In 2002 steel tendons, in red, were threaded along the beams and tightened against anchors, lifting the terrace slightly and holding it.
  1. Stone pier
  2. Sag by 1995
  3. Steel tendon, 2002
  4. Concrete beam

28Modernism, 1914 to 19751959–1973Sydney, Australia

Sydney Opera House

Every shell is cut from one sphere.

040 m183 m67 mTallest shell1Precast ribs fan out2Podium3Harbour4
Fig. 28a The shells from the west, on their podium above the harbour. Every edge is drawn as an arc of the same 75.2 m radius; the leading edge of the tallest shell is in red. The length and the height of the tallest shell are from published figures; the other shell sizes and the podium height are estimates.
  1. Tallest shell
  2. Precast ribs fan out
  3. Podium
  4. Harbour

Jørn Utzon won the competition in 1957 with sketches of white shells that no one yet knew how to build. The answer, after years of work with the engineers Ove Arup and Partners, was to cut every shell from the surface of one sphere, 75.2 metres in radius. Because each curve was the same, the ribs could be cast in standard concrete pieces and covered in a little over a million tiles. Construction ran from 1959 to 1973; Utzon left in 1966 and never saw it finished.

Sources: Wikipedia, Sydney Opera House; Sydney Opera House, The spherical solution. Estimated from drawings and photographs: individual shell heights and podium height.

75.2 mShells cut from it1One sphere2
Fig. 28b The solution Utzon found in 1961: every shell is a curved triangle cut from the surface of one sphere of radius 75.2 m. Because every curve is the same, the ribs could be cast in standard pieces and the tiles laid in repeating panels.
  1. Shells cut from it
  2. One sphere

29Contemporary, 1975 to now1971–1977Paris, France

Centre Pompidou

The pipes and stairs move outside.

020 m45 m60 m42 mFloor truss1Gerberette on column2Ducts outside3Escalator tube4Tie rod5
Fig. 29a Section across the building. Each 45 m floor truss rests on cast-steel gerberettes that pivot on the columns; the outer ends are tied down. The services, in red, run up the outside: the ducts on the east side and the escalator tube on the west. The truss depth and duct sizes are estimates.
  1. Floor truss
  2. Gerberette on column
  3. Ducts outside
  4. Escalator tube
  5. Tie rod

Renzo Piano and Richard Rogers, with the engineer Peter Rice, won the competition in 1971 with a building turned inside out. The steel frame, the ducts, pipes and wiring, and the escalators all sit on the outside, colour-coded by what they carry, so each floor inside is a clear space 45 metres wide and 166 metres long. Cast-steel brackets called gerberettes balance the floor trusses on the columns. It opened in 1977.

Sources: Centre Pompidou, Structure et modules; Wikipedia, Centre Pompidou.

8 mTruss load1Pin on the column2Cast steel3Tie rod4
Fig. 29b One gerberette, a cast-steel bracket 8 m long, in red. It pivots on a pin through the column. The floor truss presses down on the short inner arm, and a tie rod pulls down the long outer arm, so the two balance and the column takes the weight straight down.
  1. Truss load
  2. Pin on the column
  3. Cast steel
  4. Tie rod

30Contemporary, 1975 to now1993–1997Bilbao, Spain

Guggenheim Bilbao

Software from aircraft design makes the curves buildable.

040 m130 m50 mTitanium over steel1Long gallery2Bridge3River4
Fig. 30a The museum from across the river, with the long gallery running east under the bridge. One curved volume is outlined in red. The 130 m gallery is from published figures; the height and the curves are drawn from photographs, since no measured elevation was found.
  1. Titanium over steel
  2. Long gallery
  3. Bridge
  4. River

Frank Gehry's museum, opened in 1997, is clad in about 33,000 titanium panels, each less than half a millimetre thick, over curves no drawing board could describe. His office used CATIA, software made by Dassault Systèmes for designing aircraft, to model the shapes, check the structure and cut every panel and steel member to fit. Its effect on the city gave a name to culture-led regeneration: the Bilbao effect.

Sources: Wikipedia, Guggenheim Museum Bilbao; Permasteelisa, Guggenheim Museum; Guggenheim Bilbao, The building. Estimated from drawings and photographs: height and the building's outline.

Curved surface in the model1One panel2Cut flat to fit3
Fig. 30b A patch of curved skin as modelled in CATIA, software first written for aircraft. The computer described every curve exactly, so each titanium panel, in red, could be unfolded into a flat shape and cut to fit before it reached the site.
  1. Curved surface in the model
  2. One panel
  3. Cut flat to fit